Wednesday, 26 July 2017

G. Christhudhas - a Historian

History had been written by countless persons during the nineteenth century, and it was mainly through the Western writers. They believe that the sons of soil have no history and tried to make it down in written format and so numerous volumes of Books on History, culture and missionary activities has been printed. But we have our history in Oral traditions, Tamil literature books, and some in pamphlets.  The students of History studied the books of English men which glorified them and considered the natives as low, and condemned them as evil and their culture as devilish. But the recent development in the history of Christianity has changed everything and they tried to bring out the history of the people. The Church History association has taken immense measures to bring the history of the people and has published it as Books. Those books are dealing with large portion of the history, but the regional or local history is not given much importance.
Christhudhas was the Bishop of CSI Kanyakumari Diocese from May 1, 1980- January 7, 1997. His period was an epoch of Progress. After his retirement he sought to write the history of Church at Kanyakumari. He has written two books on the history of protestant church in Kanyakumari District, Namely Paathachuvadukal (Foot Prints) in Tamil which made him to write an elaborate book in English as “Precious Profiles” – The work of the LMS in South Travancore (CSI (1795-2009)). His works must be appreciated because it deals a very large era from beginning of mission to 2009. The books were systematically written, portraying the Liberation of the oppressed community. He has a good ability to do research and synthesized in a proper perception which makes his findings authentic. He has rendered a wonderful service to Church of South India and very particularly to the people of Kanyakumari.
He has tried to locate the history of the church in the context of the political history of India. No community’s history can be an isolated history; it has to be part of the National history. He has located the History of his community in the context of the political history, which is a pioneering effort. The history of his community is a liberation history; it is also a salvation history. The spiritual history of the people involves other aspects of life such as tradition, culture, economy, political and religion. For a person who is interested in mission it is about the history of mission.

A historian is the one who is an expert in history; who has authority on history, a writer of history, chronicler, and one who produces a scholarly synthesis. Historians research, analyze, interpret, and present the past by studying historical documents and sources. So Christhudhas through his valuable research has interpreted the past and presented it in a Scholarly manner. And so he can be called as historian. 

Sunday, 11 June 2017

FAMILY CONCERNS AND RELATED ISSUES

INTRODUCTION
Problems in families will lead to growing number of family break down and divorces. Today people are not concerned about family concerns like marriage, sex & family planning. But as Christians, we should be aware and concerned about families. The family life starts from marriage.
            Marriage is one of the most interesting and important subjects in the world. Everyone enter this world through the physical union of a man and a woman. Every culture in the world has its own set of customs and rules concerning marriage, sex and family. What God have to say about marriage, family and sex? Since it was God who created mankind as male and female and He joined the first man and woman together in marriage. So it is very important to understand what God has to say about marriage, sex and family.
MARRIAGE
Marriage is a social union or legal contract between individuals that creates kinship. It is an institution in which interpersonal relationships, usually intimate and sexual, are acknowledged by a variety of ways, depending on the culture. Such a union may also be called matrimony, while the ceremony that marks its beginning is usually called a wedding and the marital structure created is known as wedlock. People marry for many reasons, most often including one or more of the following: legal, social, emotional, economical, spiritual, and religious. These might include arranged marriages, family obligations, and the legal establishment of a nuclear family unit, the legal protection of children and public declaration of love. Marriage practices are very diverse across cultures, may take many forms, and are often formalized by a ceremony called a wedding.
1)    Marriage was God’s idea
            Marriage was God’s plan from the beginning. It was not man’s idea. Marriage was planned by God to meet the human need for companionship, love, mutual encouragement, practical help, and sexual satisfaction (Gen.2:18, 1Cor.7; 2-3).It is God’s plan that marriage should be the way in which children will be born and raised in the security and love created by one man and one woman, committed to each other for a lifetime (Ps127:3, Mal.2:14-16, Mat.19:6). When God created Adam in the Garden of Eden, He created a perfect man. But there was one thing Adam needed. God said,” It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him” (Gen.2:18).God decided to make another human being like himself. Adam needed the companionship of another human being like himself. God had made the other creatures as male and female (Gen.6:19).Since Adam was a male; God took one of Adam’s ribs and made a female partner for him. By doing this, God gave Adam a lifelong companion and helper and a sexual partner for marriage. Through the physical union of Adam and Eve, God planned for the human race to be continued (Gen.1:27-28, 2; 24).
2)    Marriage was the first thing God established in human society
Marriage was established by God before all other human institutions. This shows us that marriage is the foundation of human society. Marriage was established before man’s fall into sin. This shows us that marriage is Holy. In God’s plan, marriage is the basis for a morally and socially stable society. This is part of the reason why God hates adultery (Ex.20:14), fornication (1Thess.4:3-6), incest (Lev.18:6ff) and homosexuality (Rom.1:24-28).These things disrupt and twist God’s plan for a stable human society. Marriage is God’s plan for all people and all cultures in the world.
3)    God’s plan about marriage
God’s plan is that there should be one woman for one man. God made one woman for the man, He created (Gen.2:22-24).He intended for this partnership between one man and one woman to last for a lifetime. This lifetime commitment is important for several reasons. First, it guarantees care, provision and protection for the wife through out her life (Col.3:12, 13, 1Pet.3:7). Second, there is a need for the emotional security and development of the children. Third, Children need a secure and environment to grow and develop the way God intended.
4)    Is marriage bondage?
Many people think that marriage is bondage. But marriage is an agreement between two persons, a man and a woman, in which they willingly and voluntarily, bind each other in a life long bond. The bond remains till they are separated by death. In other words, marriage is meant to be extremely string and unbreakable and expected to be permanent and long-lasting. So marriage is not bondage, but a complement and a supplement.
5)    Problems in married life
Problems in married life are various and have many reasons. It may be because of suspecting each other, comparing with others, and interference of the in-laws and lack of financial freedom. Some other reasons are social, financial, physical problems, spiritual, mental, moral and emotional problems cause more harm to them. Each couple from the very first day till their separation at death faces problems. Those who confront those problems with courage and defeat them will lead a happy and fruitful life.
SEX
Sex is a process of combining and mixing genetic traits, often resulting in the specialization of organisms into a male or female variety known as a sex. The word sex is also used for sexual intercourse and gender.
Sex is a powerful force. It is something like fire. Fire is possible because of the way God made the world. Fire can be very useful. We can use fire to cook our food and to heat our homes. But if a house catches fire, it can destroy the house and even kill the people in it. The same is true about sex. Sex is possible because of the way God made men and women. Under God’s control, sex is one of god’s blessings to married people. It is the means of great pleasure and the means of bringing children into the world. Out of God’s control, sex can destroy the home and ruin human lives.
1)    Is sex a sin?
            This is a question that many young people ask today. A straight and clear answer to this from the Bible is “YES, it is a sin when out side a marital relationship”. Practices such as adultery (unfaithful to a marriage partner), fornication (Sexual relations before marriage), homosexuality (sexual relations between people of the same sex), incest (sexual relations between family members), bestiality (sexual relations with an animal) and other impure practices are an abomination to God. God gives us a list of those practices which are impure forms of sexual behavior. God has pronounced a severe judgement on these sins (Lev.20:10-21).
2)    God’s plan concerning sex
            When God created man, He created them as male and female for the purpose of sexual reproduction (Gen.1:27-28). One of the most important facts a Christian must understand about sex is that sex was God’s idea for man’s good and man’s enjoyment. It is not a sin within marriage. According to the Bible sex is both good (Gen.1:31) and (heb.13:4).it was given to man before his fall into sin in the Garden of Eden. Some people believe that the original sin of man was the fact that Adam had sex with his wife (Gen.4:1). This is a false idea. Because of sin, man has twisted and corrupted God’s plan concerning sex. According to God’s plan, sexual relations must be strictly confined to husbands and wives in the commitment of marriage.
3)    Sexual sins and its results
            Any other use of sex outside of marriage is a serious sin. Many terrible problems in the world today are the result of a sinful use of sex. Some cultures do not condemn certain sexual sins, such as fornication. If a Christian comes from such a culture, he or she must understand that it is God who has condemned fornication and other such sins. Another sexual sin is perverted sex. A terrible outcome of this perverted sexual relationship is the dreaded disease like AIDS. AIDS (Acquired immune deficiency syndrome) is caused by a virus called HIV (Human immunodeficiency virus) it is widely believed that it is originated from unnatural sex and now spreads all over the world so rapidly. Often people didn’t understand that this is a curse from God on the immoral society. Most of the sexual diseases are from unnatural sex and unfaithful partners. The disease which spreads by sexual intercourse is called as sexually transmitted Disease (STDs).
FAMILY PLANNING
            The condition of family life is reflected in the condition of the nation, so high priority should be given to the development and delivery of health and welfare services. These services should include family planning services, since family planning is intimately connected to the core functions of the family; procreation, socialization and acculturation of children.
            Family planning is the responsibility of the parents to make conscious decisions regarding the number of children they want and their spacing. Data is available which support family planning as a preventive health measure.
Definition
            Family planning is frequently used to mean that people plan when to have children, using birth control and other techniques to implement that plan. Other techniques commonly used are sexuality education, prevention and management of sexually transmitted infections, preconceptional counseling and infertility management. Family planning is sometimes used as a synonym for the use of birth control, though it often includes more.
Family planning Association India (FPA India)
            This organization was established in1949, which has been recognized as India’s leading and largest reproductive and sexual health organization. It provides information on sexuality education and family life and a wide range of services in sexual and reproductive health, including family planning, bringing health and happiness to millions.
Functions of FPA India
            FPA India strengthens a voluntary and non- government commitment to promote sexual and reproductive health and rights including family planning. It supports the rights of individuals to reproductive choices, including legal and safe abortion. Works towards reducing the spread and impact of STIs/HIV/AIDS, and increasing access to gender sensitive. SRH information, education and services to all especially the young and marginalized and eliminating violence, discrimination, and abuse.
Benefits of family planning
            It improves the health of men, women and children.
            It reduces the unwanted abortions.
            It helps the children to get good health, food, education, emotional support from parents and other resources.
            It reduces strain on environmental resources (land, food, water) and community resources (health care & education).
            It gives better health for women.
Focus on family planning by Christianity
Roman Catholics
The Roman Catholic do not accept family planning as they consider children as gifts of God. Catholic doctrine holds that God created sexual intercourse to be both unitive and procreative. This church considers deliberately altering fertility or the marital act with the intention of preventing procreation to be sinful. Thus, artificial birth control methods are forbidden, as are acts intended to end in orgasm outside the context of intercourse. At the same time, not having sex at all is considered morally acceptable. Having sex at an infertile time in a woman’s life is also considered acceptable, since the infertile condition is considered condition to be created by God, rather than as an act by the couple.
Family planning according to the Bible
            When the Lord blessed the nations, he said that mankind shall multiply and fill the land. When he gave such a blessing, he only meant to fill the land, but not to congest it with too many people. He only wanted to multiply the generations, but not the number of people. We know that “ too much of anything is good for nothing” hence it is very important to keep with the limits. Therefore it is not wrong to practice family planning.  
DOWRY
What is dowry?
            Dowry or ‘Dahej’ or Sreedhanam’ is the money, goods or estate that a woman brings to her husband in marriage. It’s the gifts given by the bride’s family to the bridegroom’s family along with the bride in Indian marriage. Kanayadanam is an important part in Hindu marital rites. Kanya means daughter and Dana means gift. The present made at the time of marriage in the form of cash, ornaments, clothes, or articles shall be deemed to dowry.
Origin of dowry
After the completion of his education at Ashram, when a young man married and began life he had no property or money. To launch him in the world, society provided him with the articles barely necessary and enough to furnish his house hold. The parents of the bride naturally were the main contributors. The gifts were mainly clothes and utensils and a cow supplemented with some ornaments for the bride and some money.
Dravidian culture
            The Dravidian culture has its own language, vast number of classical literature, well developed art and music. They even have their own religious in earlier times. This religion was not Hindu. It also appears that they had no dowry system as it is known today. But after the introduction of braminical religion into, Tamil country dowry crept in and the status of women began to sink.
Dowry and Christian concept of marriage
            The Christian concept of marriage is that God institutes marriage. In other words, we regard marriage as an order of creation. To make it more specific, marriage consists of a covenantal relationship between two people. And this is to fulfill the purpose of God. Also marriage is regard as a social and religious institution. The main emphasis in marriage is mutual love, respect, faithfulness to each other and responsibility for one another. It is a meaningful relationship.
            Since dowry is one of the main criteria in marriage, woman receives love and respect according to the amount of dowry. And there is bargaining tendency on dowry in the marriage; it reduces the sacramental value of marriage. Many people give more importance to money than to the personal worth of the people and human relationship.   
So marriage on many occasions is dependent upon the external or material things rather the value of the person, worth of human personalities. So it becomes difficult to agree in such cases marriage is an ever lasting contact of relationship between two people or the union of two hearts. This is the main reason dowry is called as social evil. The real meaning of the marriage has lost its value and the women are made as commodities without having any individual worth with the marriage.
Disadvantages of dowry system
o    Many girls from the middle class and low class families remain unmarried.
o    The parents who have more number of girl children will be in heavy debt after two or three marriages.
o    The bargaining nature of the dowry introduces commercialism in marriage and so the sanctity of marriage is lost.
o     Girls are not encouraged to get high education. The dowry system may psychologically affect girls.
DIVORCE
            The word Divorce is derived from the Greek word “apaulo” which means “ to  set free, to loose, liberate, dissolved, cut loose, or a ship at its launching, discharge, as a soldier from the army, cut a part to cause all obligation and responsibility to cease.” The meaning in dictionary is “the legal ending of marriage”. Divorce is becoming a serious problem in the modern world, especially for those who live in big cities.
History
In contrast to the Western world where divorce was relatively uncommon until modern times, divorce was a common occurrence in at least two pre-modern societies: Japan and the Muslim world.
Ancient history
            Divorce is mentioned in the Code of Hammurabi, the oldest known written compilation of laws. Believed to have been recorded around the year 1760B>C in Babylon, Hammurabi believed himself chosen by God to deliver laws to his people. His rules for divorce imply that the practice already existed in his time, might possibly be the origin for the concept of fault divorces. According to the code a man could divorce his wife if she went out of doors uncovered persisted in acting foolishly or belittled her husband.
Greco Roman History
Ancient Greece was one of history’s most sexually permissive societies. It’s not surprising, then that divorce should have been quite common in their society. The matter was a legal concern, and it required approval by magistrate subject to appropriate grounds. It was only after the city state had grown into a republic and an empire that wealthy Romans began to see divorce more liberally
  Medieval period
During the period after the Roman Empire during which the Catholic Church was the central social and political institution in the west, divorce fell into decline. When we read the gospels, Jesus says that divorce is same as committing adultery. Since adultery is forbidden by Ten Commandments, divorce was an unpardonable sin and strictly prohibited by the church.
 Christian views on divorce
Christian views of divorce find their basis both in biblical sources dating to the giving of the law to Moses (Deuteronomy 24:1-4) and political developments in the Christian world long after standardization of the Bible. According to the synoptic Gospels, Jesus equated divorce with adultery (e.g., Matthew 5:31-32, Matthew 19:3-9, Mark 10:2-12, Luke 16:18).The Christian emperors Constantine and Theodosius restricted the grounds for divorce to grave cause, but this was relaxed by Justinian in the sixth century. After the fall of the empire, family life was regulated more by ecclesiastical authority than civil authority. Henry VIII of England is known for breaking with the Roman Catholic Church partly in order to obtain a divorce.

Roman Catholic Church

By the ninth or tenth century, the divorce rate had been greatly reduced under the influence of the Church which considered marriage a sacrament instituted by God and Christ indissoluble by mere human action. Canon law makes no provision for divorce, but annulment may be granted when proof is produced that essential conditions for contracting a valid marriage were absent. The grounds for annulment are determined by Church authority and applied in ecclesiastical courts. “By marriage the husband and wife are one person in law: that is, the very being of legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage or at least incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband: under whose wing, protection and cover, she performs everything.” Since husband and wife became one person upon marriage, that oneness could only be invalid if the parties improperly entered into the marriage initially.

Eastern Orthodox

The Eastern Orthodox Church does recognize that there are rare occasions when it is better that couples do separate, but there is no official recognition of civil divorces. For the Eastern Orthodox, the marriage is indissoluble as in it should not be broken, the violation of such a union, perceived as holy, being an offense resulted from either adultery or the prolonged absence of one of the partners. The divorce rate in the Orthodox Church seems to be much lower than that of the societal averages. Divorced individuals are usually allowed to remarry though there is usually imposed on them a fairly severe penance by their bishop and the services for a second marriage in this case are more penitential than joyful.

Oriental Orthodox Church

The Oriental Orthodox Church is more severe than the Eastern Orthodox Church in terms of divorce and adopts an intermediate position between Rome and Constantinople, allowing it only in the case of adultery. This position is valid for both Copts and Armenians.

Conservative Protestant churches

Many conservative evangelical and Protestant churches, such as some Baptists, strongly oppose divorce as being a sin, pointing out Malachi 2:16 – "'For I hate divorce,' says Yahweh, the God of Israel, 'and him who covers his garment with violence!' says Yahweh of Armies. 'Therefore take heed to your spirit, that you don't deal treacherously'" (WEB). However interfaith marriages are handled differently in Ezra 9–10 and 1 Corinthians 7.
What does God say about Divorce?
            God hates divorce (Mal 2:16). Divorce destroys God’s plan for both the marriage and the family.. Although God hates divorce, He recognizes that it takes place. He deals with people where they are. He will forgive this sin, just as He will forgive other sins (Psalms 103:3)      .God will not change his mind concerning the need for life long commitment and permanence in marriage God made marriage for man’s good, to provide moral stability and order for all human society.
CONCLUSION

            We have analyzed about family concerns and related issues that people meet today in their life. As it was said above many people are not concerned about these things. But as Christians we should have concern on family, because God had made everything according to his will and plan. So as Christians we must be aware of the problems and put our trust in God to over come the problems to live a successful life. 

Friday, 31 March 2017

Formulating Historical questions, Identifying Perspectives and biases, Differentiating Objectivity and subjectivity History

Introduction
History has been defined as the knowledge of past, the work of historian is to find out the happenings of the past. When doing so he will collect documents from an archive which needs authenticity of the documents and its contents. To analyze the authenticity of documents historical method is used in research methodology. This method is negative in approach and enables a researcher to eliminate errors and thus helps to know the truth. This paper traces out the authenticity of documents through raising questions, brings out objectivity and subjectivity in historical writing and helps in identifying perspectives and biases.
1.Analytical Operation
The first task in research is mentioned technically as analytical operation[1] used to close scrutiny of the material. It has been divided into two branches, namely external and internal criticism. Its main job is to pronounce whether a given data is acceptable as a fact or not. Events as presented in the records may or may not conform to reality, for they might have been distorted, twisted or misrepresented. The two branches of analytical operation are two different apparatuses used in methodology to find out truth.[2] For John C.B. Webster these are two important criticisms for historians, in interpreting the past.[3]
1.2.External criticism- Heuristics[4]
Waitz, Mommsen and Haureau of Germany and Jadunath Sarkar are few who combine the tasks of external criticism,[5] which is used to find out the authenticity of the document,[6] it is also called as ‘lower criticism’ because it is considered to be a negative operation. The historian is cautioned never to take a document at its face value. He should begin by suspecting it and should probe deeper to find its genuineness.[7] It starts with interrogation. Is this document the same as it claims to be? Is it what I believe it to be? Is it what I am told it is? These questions should be asked by historian and find answers. Each time when he finds new trace, new piece of information or new document these questions must be asked repeatedly. The answer will give the authenticity of documents.[8] The duty of the historian is to doubt every document and statement, until its authenticity is established by critical examination and test.[9] Prof. Langlois and Seignobos hold that external criticism means, “The first group of preliminary investigation on the writing, the form, and the source.”[10]
1.3.Functions of External criticism
External criticism has mainly three functions: to establish the authorship of the document, to determine the place of the document and to fix the time of the document.[11]
1.4.The need for criticism
Finding out the genuineness of records has become a part of research.[12] External criticism usually deals with forgeries, garbled documents and partial texts, ghost writings[13], interpolation[14]and plagiarism.[15]
1.4.1.Tampered record
In Indian history there are instances of epigraphical records which have all been tampered. Historical records are tampered not for material advantage but other reasons like pride, vanity, sympathy, antipathy, personal rivalry, political differences, social distinctions, religious disputes. In such cases the question to be asked is who could carry out the forgery and why? Sometimes documents have been faked to be sold for gain or to deceive others if it is a donation grant. Scholars might fake document to provide a missing link in a sequence of events.[16]
1.4.2.Forgery
Forgeries is in fact one of the oldest and commonest of human offences. Politicians used forgeries to damage their opponents. It is believed that a large number of forgeries have been placed in all the archives. Documents are often forged to establish false claims. According to Renier, this is an extremely rare occurrence because in the raining of historians increasing emphasis is laid upon the checking documents as to whether they are forged or not.[17]
1.4.3.How to detect a forgery?
Paleography[18] helps us in this field, ancient Indian history is reconstructed mostly with the help of lithic and copper plate records. The characters of writing have changed from time to time. In forged documents the alphabets do not conform to the type prevalent at that point of time.  Likewise the handwriting, spelling, diction, style and other characteristic features suggest whether tampering has taken place.[19]
1.4.4.Textual criticism
Textual criticism raised to a very high level of refinement, is one of the techniques of determining whether a document is forged or original.[20] Scholars devote their entire time and life to external criticism in the restoration of texts, investigation of authorship, fixation of dates chronology, collection, classification and verification of documents, and hence they help historians in well authenticated document. Their job is critical scholarship, a part of external criticism which became popular in nineteenth century and this task was scientific. Some scholars oppose this method because it is mechanical but is not interpreting the past and despises critical scholarship.[21] The difference between forged letters and original letters can be understood by comparison. By comparing the texts, the words, passages, ideas and style of the author can be traced out and those which does not resemble the style of the author can be grouped as forged document. Auxiliary sciences are of immense help in carrying textual criticism in ascertaining the authorship, time and place of the document.[22]
1.5.Methods of external criticism
External criticism consists of different process or technique which may be divided into three main heads: 1. Content analysis, 2. Comparing pieces of evidences, 3. Checking the physical properties of evidence.
1.5.1.Content Analysis
Content analysis is an examination of the social content of the evidence. An evidence may speak about the authorship of the document in terms of social culture where may not be able to point out the particular author a group of authors. E.g. the seals of the humped bull and Mohanjodaro, discovered in 1922 give an idea about the Indus valley civilization.[23] Content analysis is also implies examination of anachronisms. Anarchonisms[24] are useful in checking the author ship and date of a document. E.g. a historian who knows Shakespearean anarchoronism can easily find out whether another work claimed to be Shakespeare’s. The anarchoronism used in a particular period may differ from those in use at other periods and this will the historian in determining the date of the evidence. Content analysis also helps to check the authorship and through reference to religious functions and austral[25] events. E.g. During vedic age certain religious functions prevailed and that will identify the date and authorship.
1.5.2.Comparing pieces of Evidences
Comparing pieces of evidences helps the historian a lot, in the process of external criticism. Comparison is made on the basis of language, script, style, etc. Historian should find out whether the style of the alleged writer resembles that which he exhibits in documents of known authenticity. The language script used in a document also throws considerable light on its authorship and date.
1.5.3.Checking or examining the physical properties of evidence
Spectroscopic[26] analysis or chemical analysis or Carbon analysis is used to check the paper because it has information. Made of silk or linen fibre alone and yet contain a mixture of cotton. Sometimes it purports to be of the linen and cotton periods and yet which may be made of wood pulp. The ink used in the document can also lead us to the truth. Old documents have ink containing aniline hues since such inks were not used prior to 1850. Paper and ink can be subjected to chemical tests, hand writing can be tested through graphology and microbiology. All these tests help in determining the date and authorship of the document.[27]
1.6.Internal criticism - Hermeneutics
External criticism naturally leads to internal criticism one should scrutinize the contents of the document with the intention of knowing how much of it is true, and how much false. This operation in methodology is also known as interpretative criticism. A scholar after examining the external aspects of a document proceeds to ascertain the trustworthiness. This is obviously a more fundamental and significant task, and hence it is known as higher criticism. The technique adopted in hermenutics is critical approach, whereby researcher analyzes the product of the author’s labor in order to distinguish between operations correctly and incorrectly performed.[28] A true historian should be interested in lies as well as in truths and he should try to find out the extent of truth or of falsification in a document. A document may be genuine but statements contained in it need not be always so.[29]
The first job in internal criticism is a close and miniute study of each of the ideas contained in document. As part of analysis the whole document is cut into parts. Analysis is at the root of interpretation and it is a very important mental activity, which helps to know the nature of the historical fact. Analysis isolates the ideas contained in a document and tests its validity through criticism. Each idea is separately analysed and tested to bring out which is true and false. It is the business of internal criticism to know which one is true and which one is false. Analysis is thus necessary for criticism and criticism begins with analysis.
There are two operations involved in internal criticism (i) Analysis of the content of document or Positive interpretative criticism; is to get literal and real meaning of author’s statement (ii) analysis of the conditions under which the document is produced or Negative interpretative criticism; to verify whether what the author has said conforms to what really happened to eliminate the possibility of error in his statements.[30]
1.7.Sources of Error
In internal criticism an important fault to be overcome is the source of error. More of the errors result from ignorance, bias, subjectivity, mutilation of evidence, cultural differences and misuse by adherence to a dubious system of interpretation. Two or more of these errors may exist side by side in a document and present while a historian interpret those documents. It is the duty of the historian to steer clear of them.
1.7.1.Ignorance
Ignorance may occur at two levels, from the author and from the historian. The ignorance on the part of the author’s evidence may seriously affect the preparation of the document based on the evidence. This may be due to the person’s physical, mental or social ability or disability. In the case of historian he may not receive all the facts relating to a particular event or episode and hence the documents will not contain a truthful account of it.[31]
1.7.2.Bias and subjectivity
Bias is the act of deliberately taking side or clinging to opinions based on insufficient examination of evidence. Subjectivity is not a crime and the historic can never completely avoid it, every historian is conditioned by a certain element of subjectivity which depends on his psychological matrix. Both should be eliminated completely so far as historical writing is concerned and it creates error. Historians should be aware of this and try to eliminate them as far as possible from their works.
1.7.3.Mutilation of evidence
Historians are not guilty of mutilation of evidence but there are rare exceptions. A letter document, or piece of autobiography, originally quite genuine and candid, all its parts possessing the same general value as evidence, has been revised emended or otherwise so tampered with that some parts of it become untrustworthy. Its integrity has been destroyed and the evidence which it contains mutilated. As researchers we must deal with large class of documents which are composite in character, proceeding from various hands or sources. Diary, autobiography or volume of letters should be used without a watchful eye for intimations the text has been altered or any inserted material which will reflect the writers’ shrewdness.[32]
1.7.4.Cultural difference
Cultural differences may exist between the author of the evidence and he who help in the preparation of the document as well as in the person who actually write about it. Owing to cultural differences, evidence may be falsified. Writing of an incident by two persons may present diametrically opposite points of view depending on their educational or cultural differences.
1.7.5.Falsification of Evidence
A large portion of the materials contained in a document may be partially false, either by the intention or by accident. The famous book of Charles beard ‘Economic Interpretation of the American Constitution’ is an example of international falsification of evidence. For Beard, American constitution is the result of conspiracy of the well-to-do but the records do not completely justify the views of Beard.
1.7.6.Adherence of Dubious system of Interpretation
Depending on the school of ideology historians are committed to certain ideals. The historian should always remember that he is not committed to any person or ideology. His duty is towards history and to the presentation of facts as they really happened. Historians belonging to Marxist school always give a materialistic interpretation to history, emphasizing the socio economic aspect of history.
2.Objectivity in Historical writing
Objectivity in historical writing is of capital importance for the growth of historical studies on healthy lines.[33] Modern historiography culminated in writing scientific history with objectivity of facts and interpretation. Ranke laid the foundation of history to be made objective by presentation of facts which are not subject to controversy. It is objectivity that elevates history to the discipline of science. According to E.H. Carr, the facts of history cannot be purely objective. Objectivity in history cannot be an objectivity of fact but only the relation between facts and interpretation between past, present and future, and so he gives equal importance to facts and interpretation. Historical objectivity aims to bring to light historical truth and is against personal bias, sentimental approach and partiality. Volatire and the rationalists, Ranke and the positivists contributed to the development of objectivity in history. Objectivity gives scientific character to history and disregards philosophical and materialistic interpretations of history. According to Acton, Ultimate history may not be possible in this generation and challenged the objectivity in historical writings. It is impossible to present all the facts. Historical truth is different from truth in the other disciplines. Becker, Beard and other historians of twentieth century confessed that history can never be objective or free from subjectivity. Objectivity is desirable but not attainable.[34]To Friedrich Nietzsche, objectivity is to be meaningless, impossible or undesirable.[35]
2.1.Objectivity
To be objective means not influenced by personal feeling or opinions.  Objective is the state of being objective. Objectivity in historical writing refers to “dispassionate, disinterested and scientific treatment of all events”. It means unbiased and fair writing. Scholarly writing is an impartial, unbiased and unvarnished presentation of the problem “using a tone of scientific impersonality”. Ranke, the father of scientific History, analyzed the historical sources critically, followed the principle of unbiased research and sought to write his historical accounts with ‘tranquil objectivity’.[36]
2.2.Hindrances to objectivity
W.H. Walsh points out certain hindrances to objectivity. They are: Personal likes and dislikes, Group prejudice, Religious and moral beliefs, Racial and national prejudices and conflicting theories of Historical interpretation.[37]
2.3.Importance of objectivity
Objectivity in historical writing is of critical importance and the credibility of the historical thesis depends on objective presentation. History will degenerate into fiction in the absence of objectivity. Critical study of history is not possible without objectivity. The need for objectivity in historical writing is self evident. Real history is possible only when it is written objectively. It is a matter of intellectual honesty and moral standards. Systematic methods for the attainment of objectivity in history must be employed. Objectivity ensures accuracy, authenticity and acceptability. Due to the varied historical data the historian must be cautious and careful in handling historical material.  He must be as objective as possible. Objectivity alone will save the historian and his writing from subjectivity syndrome.[38]History as a science is to reveal the truth as it is.[39]
2.4.Subjectivity
Subjectivity is antithesis to objectivity. It exists in the mind of the historian and not produced by things outside the mind. It refers to the preconceived ideas, feelings, opinions, notions etc. of the Historian. Subjectivity seems to be inescapable and is inbuilt in the art of writing history. Mostly historians are affected by the virus of subjectivity. Subjectivity and bias are not synonymous. Bias refers to historian’s predisposition. It refers to the feeling that strongly favors one side in an analysis of a historical problem or one item in a group or series of facts or events. Bias is the breeding ground of subjectivity. Bias and subjectivity are like identical twins. [40] Subjectivity itself is not bad but no writer can completely escape from it. It may be conscious or unconscious. If the historian is conscious of his subjectivity, he can avoid it while writing, but may not be completely successful since it is psychological.[41] Trevelyan points, when one writes, he is present in his work with his whole personality, with his temporant, with his reason and with his group consciousness.[42]
Conclusion
Writing history should have a scientific approach and modern writers have adopted new methods to write history, in spite there is no proper method in writing history. Historical method emerged due to the advancement of science and technology. It is negative in approach but critically analyzes the document and content and eliminates the errors and brings out the truth. Bias must be prevented in writing history until and unless it leads to subjectivity.
Bibliography
Day, Mark. The Philosophy of History. London: Continuation International Publishing, 2008.
Krishnan Nadar G. Book of Historical method and Historiography. Trivandrum: SPK Offset printing works,             1995.
Majumdar, R.K. A.N.Srivastva.  Histriography. New Delhi: SBD Publishers Distributors, 1991.
Rajayyan, K. History in theory and method. Madurai; Madurai Publishing house, 1976.
Sheik Ali, B. History: Its Theory and Method. Madras: Mac Milan India Limited, 1978.
Venkatesan, G.  A Study of Historiography. Rajapalayam: V.C. Publications, 1994.
Webster, John C.B.  Historiography of Christianity in India. New Delhi: Oxford University press, 2012.




[1] It is analytical because the whole document is not examined but is split up into its elemental parts, to its single idea and then its validity is tested. It is an operation because the document is cut open threadbare like a surgeon opens human body.
[2]B. Sheik Ali, History: Its Theory and Method (Madras: Mac Milan India Limited, 1978) ,111. (Here after cited as Sheik, History… )
[3] John C.B. Webster, Historiography of Christianity in India (New Delhi: Oxford University press, 2012), 68.
[4] Gk word meaning aiding, Inciting to find out , helping, guiding in discovery
[5] Sheik, History…,115.
[6] Sheik, History…,112.
[7] G.Krishnan Nadar, Book of Historical method and Historiography (Trivandrum: SPK Offset printing works, 1995),113. (Here after cited as Krishnan, Book of Historical…, )
[8] Sheik, History…, 112.
[9] Krishnan, Book of Historical…, 118.
[10] R.K.Majumdar, A.N.Srivastva, Histriography (New Delhi: SBD Publishers Distributors, 1991), 57.
[11] Krishnan, Book of Historical…, 113.
[12] Sheik, History…, 112.
[13] to write (an autobiographical or other article) on behalf of a person who is then credited as author.
[14] Estimation of an unknown quantity between two known quantities (historical data), or drawing conclusions about missing information from the available information.
[15] Krishnan, Book of Historical…, 113.
[16] Sheik, History…, 112, 113.
[17] Krishnan, Book of Historical…, 113.
[18] the study of ancient writing systems and the deciphering and dating of historical manuscripts
[19] Sheik, History…, 113.
[20] Krishnan, Book of Historical…, 117.
[21] Sheik, History…, 113.
[22] Krishnan, Book of Historical…,  117.
[23]Krishnan, Book of Historical… , 115.
[24] The word derives from chronos, the Greek word for “time,” and ‘ana’-, a Greek prefix meaning “up,” “back,” or “again.” When it was first used in English in the 17th century, anachronism referred to an error in the dating of something.
[25] in or coming from regions of the south; “the southern hemisphere”; “southern constellations” of, relating to, or coming from the south.
[26] the use of spectroscopy in determining the chemical or physical constitution of substances
[27] Krishnan, Book of Historical…,116.
[28] Sheik, History…,116, 117.
[29] Krishnan, Book of Historical…,118.
[30]Sheik, History…  ,117.
[31]Krishnan, Book of Historical… , 118.
[32] Krishnan, Book of Historical…,119.
[33] K.Rajayyan,  History in theory and method (Madurai; Madurai Publishing house, 1976), 253. (Here after cited as Rajayyan, History in theory…, )
[34] Krishnan, Book of Historical…, 50, 51.
[35] Mark Day, The Philosophy of History (London; Continuation International Publishing, 2008), 156.
[36] G.Venkatesan, A Study of Historiography ( Rajapalayam: V.C.Publications, 1994), 389. (Here after cited as Venkatesan, A Study of Historiography… )
[37]Krishnan, Book of Historical… ,51.
[38] Venkatesan, A Study of Historiography… , 388, 389.
[39]Rajayyan, History in theory…, 254.
[40] Venkatesan, A Study of Historiography… , 389.
[41] Krishnan, Book of Historical…,51.
[42] Rajayyan, History in theory…, 255.

‘LOGOS’ ‘LOGOS CHRISTOLOGY’

  Introduction The mystery which lies in the foundations of Western civilization is that of logos. Logos is the only word which defines al...